By Pedro Schwarzenegger
The newest ongoing contributor to Movie Show Plus. Pedro Schwarzenegger is a true Northman. A savage man in a savage place and time. His taste in cinema? Savage. And yet he does all his writing on an iPhone, like some kind of candy-ass millennial. [email protected] With a new version of "The Invisible Man" hitting theaters on Friday, February 21st, Pedro takes a look back at 2000's Paul Verhoeven-directed "Hollow Man," starring Kevin Bacon, Elisabeth Shue, Josh Brolin and Kim Dickens.
0 Comments
I say "tomato" and you say...that's a pineapple you son of a bitch! That's pretty much where the country is at when it comes to anything these days. In an age where your political leanings may influence whether you see the sky as blue or not, there is one thing that most people on the "right" and "left" can agree on: "Cats" was terrible.
If movies are a reflection of our society, one "side" claims to see themselves reflected much less often these days. As the Academy Awards continue to see their viewership dwindle over the years (this year's 23 million viewers is the lowest in the show's history...a trend that is affecting all awards shows, not just this one), there are cries from the "right" that her fair lady Oscar - and Hollywood as a whole - are more disconnected from reality than ever. The opposing view of course, is that there is never been a more dire time in our nation's history, and that it's the DUTY of anyone with a platform of any kind to try to affect change, for the betterment of us all. But one thing is true: Bitching about the Academy Awards is as American as apple pie, and has been a commonality in our country long before people were wearing red mesh or pink knit hats. For anyone that knows me, they know that the Oscars telecast is my favorite day of the year...it's a time for celebration of all things movies, and it's the clearest night to see all of the shiniest stars. I've been ridiculed (I want the Oscars to be LONGER, not shorter) and I've vehemently defended keeping the technical categories as part of the show...these categories, after all, are what made me aware of what movie-making is all about in the first place. When I asked the newest Movie Show Plus contributor, Pedro Schwarzenegger (yes, that's his real name), to participate in a friendly debate about the Oscars, the reason was thrice-fold: One, he's one of the best writers and critics out there that you need to pay attention to, if you aren't already. Two, I knew that he had...shall we say..."strong feelings" about what the Oscars have become over the course of the past few decades. And Three, I know we have different overall tastes, like how he liked Liam's Neeson's "The Grey" and how I can feel his side-eye whenever I gush publicly about "La La Land." The idea was pitched as a friendly debate. And of course, it was friendly. But as you'll see below, the conversation opened up in directions that I hadn't expected. Not to speak for Pedro (Pedro is the only one who speaks for Pedro), but I think we both came away with an absolutely MIRACULOUS discovery: That we - two dudes perhaps on the opposite end of the political spectrum and definitely on opposite ends of the Oscars spectrum - have much, much in common than we have differences. In other words, Pedro and I are a model of what civility should look like, and we hope that you can learn from us that starting a dialogue is the most effective medicine to heal this country's deep wounds. You're welcome, America. With that, I give you the epic Oscar-showdown: Santilli v. Schwarzenegger. By Pedro Schwarzenegger
The newest ongoing contributor to Movie Show Plus. Pedro Schwarzenegger is a true Northman. A savage man in a savage place and time. His taste in cinema? Savage. And yet he does all his writing on an iPhone, like some kind of candy-ass millennial. [email protected] By Pedro Schwarzenegger The newest ongoing contributor to Movie Show Plus. Pedro Schwarzenegger is a true Northman. A savage man in a savage place and time. His taste in cinema? Savage. And yet he does all his writing on an iPhone, like some kind of candy-ass millennial. [email protected] In the famous words of Mugatu: “Hansel’s soooo hot right now.” Both Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters and this week’s Gretel & Hansel are bastardized adaptations of the same classic fairy tale, both released in January. Hollywood’s trash trove month for movies deemed generally uncompetitive any other time of the year. Namely, because they universally score poorly in test screenings.
Which, in the case of Tommy Wirkola’s (Dead Snow, Dead Snow: Red vs Dead) Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters, meant a righteous scalding by the press pool. The film still suffers a 15% blight on the Tomatometer to this day, (“It's an appalling, insulting and cynical mess from start to finish.” - The London Evening Standard) seven years after its release (the movie would go on to gross 226 million worldwide). Of course we could juxtapose that score against the movie’s Amazon star-rating average, which is honestly the single most accurate gauge for rentability and watchability. With nearly 5,000(!) reviews, Witch Hunters has nearly a perfect five star film score at the online mega-store. As if anyone cares what the paying customer thinks... Meanwhile word on the street has it that Orion Pictures isn’t even screening Gretel & Hansel (opening Friday, January 31st) for the press, pre-release. Which is as dark an omen as you’ll find in any Grimm’s Fairy Tale. Very dark indeed. Welcome to January film aficionados. This is hexed ground we tread upon. |
Looking for a specific movie or review?
Search Below: Categories
All
Archives
October 2024
|